textualdeviance: (WTF Tasty Bite)
So, I wrote this thing about fanworks over on my quasi-pro blog, and got a response from someone who's apparently a big Fanfic is Legit!!! crusader.

Oh, dear.

Her attitude, going by the LJ post she linked to, is emblematic of a huge problem I see among some fanworks creators (primarily fic writers, but I've seen it in other media): the notion that they're somehow on a creative par with people who create original works largely from scratch.

Ehm. No.

(Good) fanfic takes effort, of course (hi, may I show you all ~200,000 words of fic I've written?) but it's simply not the same thing as creating original characters and worlds from scratch, and it's also not even the same thing as creating a truly derivative work (as I explained in my comment, one that strips down a story to its component parts, and reassembles it into something largely new.)

There is, of course, virtually nothing out there that's wholly original. Most plots are variations on the hero's journey or boy-meets-girl, and most settings and characters can be boiled down to a handful of archetypes. Yet, there's still quite a lot of work that goes into world- and character-building when creating a new piece, even if you're using an existing template. If you're skipping over that step, and using worlds and characters someone else made as-is, you're simply not putting in the same amount of effort as someone who has--and you do NOT deserve the same amount of credit, creative respect or--FSM forbid--pay.

People, not plots )

Now, of course I'm not saying there's something wrong with fanfic or the people who write it. The vast majority of fic writers and readers are perfectly awesome people, and I'd have to hate myself if that were not the case. I'm also not saying that people who write fic are inherently bad writers. On the contrary, some are incredibly good at what they do, and many have also gone on to create some great original works. But fic itself simply doesn't take the same amount of skill and effort as creating a work with original characters and worlds, and therefore those works simply don't deserve the same amount of creative respect as ones that do. Yes, a 50,000-word fic takes effort, but it's just not the same as creating a 50,000-word novel from scratch, so don't expect the same kudos, yeah?

Fanworks serve a wonderful purpose in helping fans to immerse themselves further in a world they love. It's audience participation in its purest form. But it's important for us to remember that that's what our role is: audience. We are there to experience something that someone else made, and we create and consume fanworks as a way of experiencing that on a closer, more intimate level. We make what we do as tribute to the people whose work we love, not as a way to get attention or to make ourselves seem important to other fans. Those who spend much of their fanworks time worrying about feedback or arguing that they're making Art! are missing the point.
textualdeviance: (*headdesk*)
An ONTD post lambasting Cassandra Claire kind of rubbed me the wrong way this morning.

Having not been directly involved in her particular kerfluffles, I can't speak to the merit thereof. Also haven't read her stuff, so I can't speak to that, either (though I still think the VSDs were hilarious, and I still have a "Sam Will Kill Me..." T-shirt.)

But I will say this: From what I can tell, she didn't actually kill any kittens. Nor did she do anything nearly on the scale of, say, what VB and Orangeblossom did. So why is it still necessary to grind on her for something that happened nine years ago? Even if she had been found guilty of abject plagiarism and fraud, whatever jail sentence or fines she'd have gotten for that would've been long gone by now. She may well be an asshole for some reason or another now, and she may well be a hack, but if so, people should be focusing on that, and not on whatever she did ages ago.

There are a lot of things that merit long-term anger and grudges. Violence and intentional bigotry, for instance are things that don't--and shouldn't--get easily forgotten. But this? Just sorta smacks of obsessives whose lives revolve around fandom drama rather than truly wounded parties seeking proper justice. (Wikis? Really? C'mon.)

I spose it's obvious where I'm going with this.

Oh, LOTR drama, how sad were you? )

Not saying, again, that Cassie deserves no criticism. Not my place to judge what she's doing now. Just saying that a little perspective is warranted, and digging up past misdeeds and making more of them than there is is petty and childish. At some point, one starts wondering whether such ongoing drama is coming less from a place of legitimate griping and more from a place of frustrated fic writers who are bitter that one of their own went pro.

Profile

textualdeviance: (Default)
textualdeviance

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 26th, 2025 01:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios