Feb. 3rd, 2011 08:21 pm
So, does this mean I'm a lesbian?
My time was a few years before this; I was into Andrew McCarthy, Tommy Howell, Rob Lowe, Duran Duran, etc. But the point still stands: I was totally into those pretty, pretty boys.
And... I still am.
I think there's some validity to the reasoning, here: Very young girls who are just figuring sex out go for boys who seem sexually non-threatening. And so would lesbians. Girls who had experienced sexual abuse would probably go for the theoretically neutered ones, too.
In my case, though the latter was a small factor, it was different. I didn't want those boys because I just wanted to hold hands and walk on the beach with them. I wanted them because I wanted to do the nasty. Only I wanted to be the one doing the...doing. So to speak.
The vast majority of the men I'm attracted to now are ones who have a slightly submissive vibe. Big, macho dudes who want some me-Tarzan missionary lovin' are going to be sadly disappointed with the kind of boinkery I prefer. The non-macho boys, though? Well, speaking from experience, they're plenty happy when someone wants to lay them out and make them see god.
I admit to some annoyance when people assume that because I'm attracted to these kinds of guys, that means I'm secretly a lesbian. Supposedly, what I'm attracted to is femininity, and therefore that means I solely want the ladies.
Ehm.
So, let's look at the women I crushed out on when I was a young thing, shall we?
Martha Quinn
Mary Stuart Masterson (in Watts/Idgie mode)
Ally Sheedy
Jo from Facts of Life
... You get the point.
So, if my attraction to pretty boys means I'm a lesbian, does my attraction to tomboys mean I'm actually straight?
Or, does it really mean that I just have a type, and it's the same basic gender expression, just without too much care about the actual physical configuration?
I'll go with door number three, Monty.
FTR, I do have more types than that. Curvy goddess sorts, for instance. Come to mama, darlings.
And... I still am.
I think there's some validity to the reasoning, here: Very young girls who are just figuring sex out go for boys who seem sexually non-threatening. And so would lesbians. Girls who had experienced sexual abuse would probably go for the theoretically neutered ones, too.
In my case, though the latter was a small factor, it was different. I didn't want those boys because I just wanted to hold hands and walk on the beach with them. I wanted them because I wanted to do the nasty. Only I wanted to be the one doing the...doing. So to speak.
The vast majority of the men I'm attracted to now are ones who have a slightly submissive vibe. Big, macho dudes who want some me-Tarzan missionary lovin' are going to be sadly disappointed with the kind of boinkery I prefer. The non-macho boys, though? Well, speaking from experience, they're plenty happy when someone wants to lay them out and make them see god.
I admit to some annoyance when people assume that because I'm attracted to these kinds of guys, that means I'm secretly a lesbian. Supposedly, what I'm attracted to is femininity, and therefore that means I solely want the ladies.
Ehm.
So, let's look at the women I crushed out on when I was a young thing, shall we?
Martha Quinn
Mary Stuart Masterson (in Watts/Idgie mode)
Ally Sheedy
Jo from Facts of Life
... You get the point.
So, if my attraction to pretty boys means I'm a lesbian, does my attraction to tomboys mean I'm actually straight?
Or, does it really mean that I just have a type, and it's the same basic gender expression, just without too much care about the actual physical configuration?
I'll go with door number three, Monty.
FTR, I do have more types than that. Curvy goddess sorts, for instance. Come to mama, darlings.
Tags:
no subject
I'd say that it's partly like the Japanese anime concept of Bishonen, or "Pretty Boys". They're the emotionally accessible boys, they're the ones who are open minded and willing to have given and take and not assume that their relationships will automatically fall into gender normative role patterns. This happens to also make them a bit closer to the middle of the Kinsey scale when it comes to reading as one gender or the other sexually. This can be just as true of certain types of women who choose to be tough, self reliant, and independent in a way that defies conventional stereotype. When put together as a composite whole, there's a certain type in there, yes. And if you happen to be attracted either physically or intellectually to that type, it stands to reason that you'd be attracted to it in both genders since it is manifest in both.
no subject
Generally, all the women I am attracted to are the rough and tough, take no bullshit kind of girls. My current
lustsationcrush is like that. *headdesksighheaddesk*no subject
no subject
*ahem* I should perhaps not respond to posts while writing porn.
Carry on.