![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Apr. 18th, 2006 04:12 pm
Case in point
Okay, so I love my law class, even though I missed a few questions on our quiz today (got a couple of cases confused, dammit.)
And then I just saw this ruling.
This is almost identical to a case we discussed in class. And it works on a similar principle to this case, which I'm hoping will get dismissed for similar reasons.
To those who don't understand the principle at work here, let me explain:
( First Amendment 101 )
So, in translation here, the court has ruled that the university is not obligated to provide public funds to this group. No-one is ever entitled to public funding of any kind on principle. Public funding is, and should be, managed on a case by case basis.
( about the Georgia Tech case )
And then I just saw this ruling.
This is almost identical to a case we discussed in class. And it works on a similar principle to this case, which I'm hoping will get dismissed for similar reasons.
To those who don't understand the principle at work here, let me explain:
( First Amendment 101 )
So, in translation here, the court has ruled that the university is not obligated to provide public funds to this group. No-one is ever entitled to public funding of any kind on principle. Public funding is, and should be, managed on a case by case basis.
( about the Georgia Tech case )
