Mar. 22nd, 2010 04:13 pm

Yes, this

textualdeviance: (More You Know)
Scalzi's in good form today. He's encapsulated a couple of my positions on things in very succinct ways:

On the healthcare bill

The GOP was not simply opposed to health care, it was opposed to it in shrill, angry, apocalyptic terms, and saw it not as legislation, or in terms of whether or not health care reform was needed or desirable for Americans, but purely as political strategy, in terms of whether or not it could kneecap Obama and bring itself back into the majority. As such there was no real political or moral philosophy to the GOP’s action, it was all short-term tactics, i.e., take an idea a majority of people like (health care reform), lie about its particulars long enough and in a dramatic enough fashion to lower the popularity of the idea, and then bellow in angry tones about how the president and the Democrats are ignoring the will of the people. Then publicly align the party with the loudest and most ignorant segment of your supporters, who are in part loud because you’ve encouraged them to scream, and ignorant because you and your allies in the media have been feeding them bad information. Whip it all up until health care becomes the single most important issue for both political parties — an all-in, must win, absolutely cannot lose issue.

On Religion:

In a nutshell, I’m an agnostic, not of the “I’m waffling and don’t want to have to choose” sort, but of the “I don’t believe in the existence of God but there’s no way to know for certain, so as a matter of intellectual honesty I have to call myself agnostic” stripe. As regards Jesus, as I’ve noted here before I don’t personally doubt that Jesus existed, but as a natural extension of my agnosticism I don’t believe he was in any way divine. As regards religion, I don’t follow any in particular and as a general thought I tend to believe that religions often have admirable moral and philosophical goals but their essential qualities are contingent on the humans in them, and you know how humans are. This makes religions much like any other large organization involving humans.
Jul. 28th, 2009 06:43 pm

Random

textualdeviance: (Default)
Got in to work several hours late due to a downtown B'vue power outage that took out my building (as I was on the way in; I arrived to find it shut down.) Tried to get a few things done by parking in M's office on main campus, but without tool access, I was fairly hamstrung. The bummer is that I won't get paid for those missing hours, of course.

--

Sickened by the ongoing story about the family who let their diabetic daughter die because they believe illness is the result of sin. Ugh. Of all the religious fanatics I hate, the ones who visit violence upon their innocent kids piss me off the most. Fair enough if you want to starve yourself or not get blood transfusions or beat yourself with a stick every night or whatever else you think will get you closest to $deity. But don't do that shit to your kids, who have no choice.

--

Also randomly pondering the relative political issues of different kinds of poor folk.

Not all poor folks are poor for the same reasons. Racism has to be addressed for PoCs (and in different ways for different communities), language barriers for immigrants, crime and environmental issues for the urban poor and lack of access to services for rural poor. And even when some communities seem the same on the surface, they can be very different. An immigrant from Mexico fleeing economic persecution faces very different issues than one from Somalia who is fleeing death squads, even if both need access to basic services in a language they can understand. A poor white woman in Appalachia faces very different issues than a poor black woman in Dallas, even if both may be trying to escape domestic violence.

The pity is that this sort of thing frequently gets percieved as competitive, when it shouldn't be. Giving targeted help to one community should in no way mean less help to another. We can acknowledge that some groups may have more critical needs than others while still not abandoning our obligations to other groups, or assuming that because they have some measure of privilege that another group may not, that they don't need help at all.

And truly, IMHO, that's the key to solving most social problems: Not homogenizing people who need help, as if they were just some great, unwashed mass about which we don't want to have to think.

--

Really dreading the idea of going back to the roasting pit villa tonight. It's 95 degrees in B'vue right now. Sigh...
textualdeviance: (Default)
*Pet peeve: people who say "God helped me (good thing)" or "cured my (disease/addiction)." WTF? Arrogant fucks. I guess that means that people who have rotten things happen or who don't recover from a disease aren't special enough to merit the blessings of the Divine? Get over yourself. There is some evidence that prayer/meditation etc. can help bring about positive changes, but this isn't God--it's humans. Plenty of people recover from illnesses without any prayer, and plenty of people who have entire warehouse churches on their side still die. You are not God's little chosen person.

*Interesting legal thing: Apparently, workplace proselytizing is against the law (for workplaces covered by federal law--meaning those with more than 15 employees.) Know a co-worker who won't stop handing you Chick Tracts or quoting Bible verses at you? You can legally tell them to BTFO.

*While I'm on the subject of religion: This stuff fascinates me. (Note for [livejournal.com profile] mekle: this is part of what I was talking about last night. Also look here.)

*Happy moment: Darcy Burner is kicking ass on fundraising. Yay!

*Amused moment: Seeing someone describe the Unitarian church as "organized agnosticism." I'll buy that. :)

*Pet peeve #2: People who insist that correlation = causation, especially when it comes to health issues.

*Watching today's Woot-off almost paid off: I missed the Bag o' Crap by just a few seconds. Next time, mebbe.

*The Sims 2 is a far more complex game than I originally thought. I've mostly just used it to build houses. The actual gameplay has a bunch more layers to it. Also, there is a metric fuckton of custom content out there. Holy craptaters.

*A week from now, I will finally have two of my rooms back, as the interminable flooring project will finally be finished and the furniture will finally be in. Then I can re-load my china cabinet with all my Willow (including the armload of new stuff I wasted money on bought on eBay this week.) I also should finally be able to park in my garage again once we get the last of my apartment furniture moved into the spare room where it belongs.

*Keeping a box of Fruit Leather next to one's desk can cause overconsumption. This then leads to tummy aches. Ugh.

*I think I'm going to join chorus again this fall. I need something to keep me busy, and until I have a job I really want, that's the best bet. Besides--I haven't done any real singing in ages, and I miss it.

*This article pissed me off. I've been working for ~15 years to get people to understand that PCOS causes weight gain instead of the other way around, and some jackass who did a correlational population study--not any actual research into the endocrinology or genetic roots of the illness--is now claiming otherwise, and some lazy reporter is quoting him at the top of her story. Not only that, but the whole story is "oh, these poor unfeminine women." Ugh. Whatever. It doesn't help that so many women don't seek treatment for this unless they want to become more feminine or breed. Hi--you're at risk of dying from this, honey. I don't think your treasure trail is your biggest concern.

*Thanks to the loaner from [livejournal.com profile] mrdorbin, we're about halfway through season 2 of B5. I'm actually kind of impressed. The first season sort of sucked, thanks to Troy McClure Acting School graduate Michael O'Hare, but once they got rid of him, things started getting interesting. And I heart Ivanova. Yes, you may all pretend to act surprised. ;)

*Dare I hope that this new guy on Eureka will be a regular and Fargo's boyfriend? Damn, he's hot.

*Anyone know what day the CSI season premiere is?
textualdeviance: (Cascadia)
On my way back to the Ham from home, I stopped to get gas. I was followed off the exit by an aging Taurus. Not unusual. What was unusual is that it followed me into the gas station and then parked in front of me. Crosswise.

A 40something, balding white guy stepped out leaving his (I assume) wife and two kids in the car. He proceeded to grill me--in a saccharinely polite manner--about my FSM decal.

Being, quite frankly, a little scared of this guy, I kind of blew it off as "an online in joke." Which it sort of is. But he wouldn't let it go. He wanted to know whether it was intended to be like the "Christian or Darwin fish" and whether it was "pro or con"--on the Christian fish.

I told him it was a joke on intelligent design. He nodded, and said, "Oh, OK." He got back in his car and left--his kids staring out the back window at the Crazy Anti-Kristian Lady trying to pump her gas in peace.

I realize that the decal in question is somewhat confrontational--that's the point--but I didn't exactly expect to be accosted by a guy with his kids in the car. He wasn't hostile about it, but just... creepy. I expected him to launch into a proselytizing tirade, but he didn't--at least not at me.

I've had plenty of comments on the things that festoon my car. I always have some bumper sticker or other, and there's usually some sort of political bent. For a while, I had an SLGC sticker on my old car, and had a rather scary experience with a truck full of nasty high school boys hurling insults at me at a stoplight. Usually--let's face it, this is a blue state--I just get the whole "hell yeah" and thumbs up stuff. It's strange to have someone actually get in my face about it, especially when the decal in question isn't particularly rude or mean-spirited it itself.

The FSM campaign, though it's a bit out of fashion now, does have some elements of mockery--oh, those silly Kristians and their 6,000-year-old Earth!--but there's a serious side to it, too. There's a good, solid argument behind the giggles: If they're going to insist that creationism be taught in science classes, they need to give equal time to ALL creation myths, however far-fetched they may seem, because none of them have any more scientific merit than the others.

Putting this decal on my car and supporting the FSM campaign isn't just about mocking. It's about pointing out that science classes need a foundation in empiricism. Without the scientific method in place as the foundation for all scientific education, we're screwed, because people will start arguing that gravity was just Newton's opinion, and their opinion that the earth actually sucks is equally valid.

I honestly don't care what beliefs people have about the origin of matter. Xenu, FSM, The Valar, whatever. If it makes you happy, go for it. What I have a problem with is people who try to teach those beliefs as if they were scientific fact, and people who try to teach beliefs that actually CONTRADICT established scientific fact. We may not know from whence the first hydrogen atom came, but we do know how humans developed on planet Earth. Declaring that we were made--separately from all other species--out of dust and bones by the hand of a deity goes against that. It's a quaint and interesting mythology, but it's not scientific fact and should never be taught as such.

I probably shouldn't have been such a wimp when this guy confronted me, but I didn't want to get into it right then and there in the rain. I hope he looks up the FSM thing (I told him what it stands for) and gets the message. Those wide-eyed, curious kids of his need to know.

Profile

textualdeviance: (Default)
textualdeviance

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 8th, 2026 08:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios