Date: 2010-11-19 07:30 pm (UTC)
Also, I may just be seeing this wrong, but I think you're engaging in a bit of false equivalency.

If a woman's creativity or intelligence were so culturally valued that women without them faced serious social ostracism, then I think you could compare shallowness on those things with shallowness about aesthetics. But that's just not the case. It may be true that a rare few subcultures value these things more than they do a woman's looks, but even some of the ones that one might think would do so don't. Even in scientific fields, for instance, "attractive" women are more successful than equally qualified colleagues who don't fit cultural standards for looks.

Attractive women with no other skills whatsoever can make fortunes just by standing around and looking pretty. Unattractive women have to actually be better than average at what they do to get anywhere.

It may be that none of this is your personal experience for one reason or another, but statistically, it's definitely true for American culture, at least.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

textualdeviance: (Default)
textualdeviance

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 17th, 2025 02:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios