Blessed be!

[textualdeviance]

This is about right, I'd say, though I'm not as deistic as some pagans, since I don't believe in any conscious deities, and I do tend more toward science and rationality than a dependence on the divine. Mebbe an Agnotic Pagan, perhaps.

Take the quiz: "WHAT RELIGION BESTS SUITS YOU?"

New Aged/Wiccan
An it harm none, do as ye will. You are a fluffy bunny. You wouldn't harm a fly. Actually, you might demonstrate to SAVE the flies! Than again, you're probably busy casing love spells, using a psychic talent, being a Vegetarian or trying to save the Rainforests. Either way, you're harmless.

Comments

[weetanya.livejournal.com]

Take the quiz: "WHAT RELIGION BESTS SUITS YOU?"

Pagan/Occultist
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law. Spending your entire life searching various forms of philosophy and religion, you choose to observe everything and believe little. You're personality is one of truth seeking, nature respecting and god/goddess accepting. Lastly, you don't judge anyone, but if annoyed, you will exact some form of revenge. You don't believe in the Three-Fold Law.

hm. interesting.

Indeed interesting...

[davebooth.livejournal.com]

Because whilst I also scored as a pagan/occultist there actually isnt a category there for me.

Perhaps there should be an "old-style wiccan" categroy in there somewhere between the wiccan and pagan brackets..

Fluffy bunny? Vegetarian? No way. Nature bleeds, it eats stuff. So do I. Bunnies are stew that hasnt been cooked yet. Threefold law? Sure, but that doesnt mean I cant open a righteous can o' whoopass if its required - I just have to accept that its going to bounce at me too so it had better be *really* required... The whole truth-seeking, nature-respecting and god/goddess-accepting thing for the pagan category is about right, but "believing little" just doesnt fit. As for exacting revenge, go find a healthy tiger and give it a boot in the tail.. when it eats you it isnt getting revenge for the bruised ego...