textualdeviance: (maui)
[personal profile] textualdeviance
So some guy put up links to all the Playboy centerfolds, evah. (NSFW, obviously.)

Now, I'm not into the retro-girlie thing--I think it's kind of silly to emulate an era/style that was so sexist--but I must admit that most of the earlier models were considerably more attractive than the plastic bimbos they have these days. They actually had real curves, for one.

This lovely gal, for instance. These days, that cute chick would be considered fat.

Or this luscious lovely.

Baby got BACK

In the late 60s, you can see them starting to get skinnier, like so and so. But they still had curvier ones, too.

(side note: how amusing--my shuffle is playing Simon and Garfunkel and Joni Mitchell while I'm looking at the 60s and 70s ones..heh)

By the 70s, they still had some big boobs, but the rest of the bodies were much more slender. The broad hips, soft thighs and round bums were all but gone.

But at least then the models still had pubes. Those started disappearing in the 80s. By the 90s, the landing strip was common. These days, pubes are basically gone.

Just to give you an idea of how much things have changed, there was a big deal made about the 1993 playmate of the year--Anna Nicole Smith--because she was supposedly the first "plus size" playmate in years. She weighed ~175 lbs and looked like this.

Um. That's not plus size, folks. That's just not anorexic.

Generally speaking, my tastes run considerably curvier (except for tomboys, who can rile me up when they're rangy or athletic) but I do think it's a tragedy that the idealized female image has gone from this or this to this.
Date: 2006-05-07 09:23 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] derekja.livejournal.com
wow, the last picture doesn't even look real. I don't find anorexic plastic attractive...

Date: 2006-05-07 10:16 pm (UTC)

sheistheweather: (Eyeliner)
From: [personal profile] sheistheweather
Yeah, it's like they want men with breasts and pussies now. Where are the real curves?!

It's sad.
Date: 2006-05-08 12:49 am (UTC)

ironymaiden: (six seeds)
From: [personal profile] ironymaiden
i feel like they moved from being pictures of the women you know, but without clothes, to a complete object. even the lighting - in the early ones it looks like sunshine or interior lights and in the more recent one they are obviously in a studio with operating theater wattage.

i can build fantasies about the earlier ones. i can't even think of the later ones as people - they're like blow-up dolls.
Date: 2006-05-08 01:08 am (UTC)

From: [identity profile] thefirstalicat.livejournal.com
One thing I notice is that even in the more recent anorexic women, big tits prevail, which in itself suggests the disposable nature of the "ideal woman." That is, a D-cup at 24 is gonna be in serious pain at 48, when those tits are sagging and dragging weight down on the shoulder and upper back muscles. (Not to mention that more likely than not, they will be more or less at waist level without bras propping them up - not so attractive then, boys, eh?)
Date: 2006-05-08 04:11 am (UTC)

From: [identity profile] foxykc.livejournal.com
also notice the evolution of how much they show. At first it's just tits. Then tits and ass... then the rest of it.

Profile

textualdeviance: (Default)
textualdeviance

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 10:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios